OBAMA OR ROMNEY
a im just translating like google..
hokiefanthis is stolen.. thanks to the source....
An economics professor at a local college made a statement that he had never failed a single student before, but had recently failed an entire class. That class had insisted that Obama's socialism worked and that no one would be poor and no one would be rich, a great equalizer.
The professor then said, "OK, we will have an experiment in this class on Obama's plan." All grades will be averaged and everyone will receive the same grade so no one will fail and no one will receive an A.... (substituting grades for dollars - something closer to home and more readily understood by all).
After the first test, the grades were averaged and everyone got a B. The students who studied hard were upset and the students who studied little were happy. As the second test rolled around, the students who studied little had studied even less and the ones who studied hard decided they wanted a free ride too so they studied little..
...
The second test average was a D! No one was happy. When the 3rd test rolled around, the average was an F. As the tests proceeded, the scores never increased as bickering, blame and name-calling all resulted in hard feelings and no one would study for the benefit of anyone else. To their great surprise, ALL FAILED and the professor told them that socialism would also ultimately fail because when the reward is great, the effort to succeed is great, but when government takes all the reward away, no one will try or want to succeed. It could not be any simpler than that.
Remember, there IS a test coming up. The 2012 elections.
These are possibly the 5 best sentences you'll ever read and all applicable to this experiment:
1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.
2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.
4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it!
5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation.
hokiefan
HennyPennyI don't think there are many who will argue a pure socialist economy will work. Like you say the incentives aren't there to work hard. But what many people don't realize is just about every country has mixed economies with elements of socialism and free markets. Both have their advantages and disadvantages. National Defense, fire/police protection, education, food and drug administration, and infrastructure, for example, are all things that a free market would probably not provide adequate funding from the private sector for. There are many that argue that it is an all or nothing debate while they should be looking at whether or not specific programs need gov't funding.
That said, healthcare is a tricky issue; while we all hope that everyone is able to be taken care of if they need it, programs like medicare and medicaid have caused medical costs to become extremely high and is bankrupting us. As the program exists now it is similiar to a ponzi scheme where some unlucky generation will be forced to pay for it for 40+ years and when they retire to try and get their benefits, it wont be there.
you are kind of contradicting yourself. blaming the current party in office for not providing any jobs, yet you applaud romney for making money by displacing jobs to foreign markets.
where is your proof he can do a good job? im sure the opposition has proof he will do a poor job at that
how many companies have factories and/or assemble in mexico? how many of your multi-billion corporations and conglomerates have sweat shops, i mean factories in Asia? instead of paying fair and competitive wages in the domestic market, they outsource to maximize profit so they can pay themselves their millions in bonuses.

hokiefanhttp://www.infowars.com/shameless-looters-display-stolen-goods-on-twitter/
the last one really irks me, "we not stealin, we taking back from da white man". Is it okay to steal because someone has more than you? I mean this is pathetic, people taking opportunity of other folks in a time of tragedy.
Lol..don't let those fake posts show your colors
wormdogg10the last one really irks me, "we not stealin, we taking back from da white man". Is it okay to steal because someone has more than you? I mean this is pathetic, people taking opportunity of other folks in a time of tragedy.
C'mon son you can do better to the rascist Right then to post about fake shit!!! This isnt the time for that nonsense.
hokiefanthe last one really irks me, "we not stealin, we taking back from da white man". Is it okay to steal because someone has more than you? I mean this is pathetic, people taking opportunity of other folks in a time of tragedy.
C'mon son you can do better to the rascist Right then to post about fake shit!!! This isnt the time for that nonsense.
i didn't post it up knowing it was fake.. thanks for the fact check, i apologize for spreading false news. too many internet trolls out there looking to make attention.
DemOlitionthe last one really irks me, "we not stealin, we taking back from da white man". Is it okay to steal because someone has more than you? I mean this is pathetic, people taking opportunity of other folks in a time of tragedy.
C'mon son you can do better to the rascist Right then to post about fake shit!!! This isnt the time for that nonsense.
good find sir


First
