Item Title

Item Description

OBAMA's 2nd TERM Discussion Thread

13 years ago  #741
Level 21
Status: offline
Gang: The Deplorables
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 7 months
Posts: 2,666

i'm tired of irresponsible people. any smokers in here?

13 years ago  #742
Level 34
Status: offline
Gang: Disciples of Bino
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 10 months
Posts: 3,889

Originally posted by hokiefan i'm tired of irresponsible people. any smokers in here?

lol..actually used to smoke 2 packs of newport a day....quit cold turkey the day my daughter was born..not cause I wanted to..just to damn expensive..northeast taxes the fuck outta them.

13 years ago  #743
Level 21
Status: offline
Gang: The Deplorables
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 7 months
Posts: 2,666

Originally posted by shawshank
Originally posted by hokiefan i'm tired of irresponsible people. any smokers in here?

lol..actually used to smoke 2 packs of newport a day....quit cold turkey the day my daughter was born..not cause I wanted to..just to damn expensive..northeast taxes the fuck outta them.

a pack a day smoker in NY will pay about $4,500 per year in cigarettes. worst part of all, we're using those proceeds from cig taxes to fund programs like the childrens health insurance program. what happens when people stop smoking, do those programs just get cut?

"In a study conducted on behalf of the New York State Department of Health, it revealed that low-income smokers (those in households making under $30,000), spent an average of 23.6% of their annual household income on cigarettes, compared to 2.2% for smokers in households making over $60,000.[15]"

13 years ago  #744
Level 32
Status: offline
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 14 years, 2 months
Posts: 2,629

Originally posted by shawshank
Originally posted by FAMOdick
Originally posted by shawshank Dick..don't be a revisionist of history...just taking your 1 sector (buiding)..seems the housing building/buying apex was 2005-2006 which would make "your" good time during the bush administration (altho it was a bubble brought on by other factors which were encouraged by Democrats and ultimately burst)...now as Reagan told Mondale in 84 I won't hold your youth and inexperience against you..but all economic conditions run in cycles not withstanding what party controls the white house..whether it was Reagans boom stock market years or the 87 crash..in 91-93 I think I was making +30% per year and then the tech bubble burst..or obamas 09 low point to current recovery...it's all cycles.....as far as bush,most if not all posters on this thread (hokie included,any many other obama detractors) have not given bush the praise/credit I have..so you can put that all on me

ewwwww eeeee ewwwww ahhhhh ahhhhh ching chang wallla walla bing bang!!

So does that mean you understand my cycle explanation?? (Sorry not up on this new slang)

i know my wife has a monthly cycle , and i know what political party are for the common people , and what party is for CEO'S , BANKERS ,INSURANCE COMPANIES and the rest of theTOP 10%

13 years ago  #745
Level 21
Status: offline
Gang: The Deplorables
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 7 months
Posts: 2,666

Originally posted by FAMOdick
Originally posted by shawshank
Originally posted by FAMOdick
Originally posted by shawshank Dick..don't be a revisionist of history...just taking your 1 sector (buiding)..seems the housing building/buying apex was 2005-2006 which would make "your" good time during the bush administration (altho it was a bubble brought on by other factors which were encouraged by Democrats and ultimately burst)...now as Reagan told Mondale in 84 I won't hold your youth and inexperience against you..but all economic conditions run in cycles not withstanding what party controls the white house..whether it was Reagans boom stock market years or the 87 crash..in 91-93 I think I was making +30% per year and then the tech bubble burst..or obamas 09 low point to current recovery...it's all cycles.....as far as bush,most if not all posters on this thread (hokie included,any many other obama detractors) have not given bush the praise/credit I have..so you can put that all on me

ewwwww eeeee ewwwww ahhhhh ahhhhh ching chang wallla walla bing bang!!

So does that mean you understand my cycle explanation?? (Sorry not up on this new slang)

i know my wife has a monthly cycle , and i know what political party are for the common people , and what party is for CEO'S , BANKERS ,INSURANCE COMPANIES and the rest of theTOP 10%

yeah like these companies:

University of California $1,648,685

Goldman Sachs $1,013,091

Harvard University $878,164

Microsoft Corp $852,167

Google Inc $814,540

JPMorgan Chase & Co $808,799

Citigroup Inc $736,771

Time Warner $624,618

Sidley Austin LLP $600,298

Stanford University $595,716

National Amusements Inc $563,798

WilmerHale LLP $550,668

Columbia University $547,852

Skadden, Arps et al $543,539

UBS AG $532,674

IBM Corp $532,372

General Electric $529,855

US Government $513,308

Morgan Stanley $512,232

Latham & Watkins $503,295

13 years ago  #746
Level 32
Status: offline
Gang: DUFFLE BAG BOYS
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 16 years, 1 month
Posts: 19,109

HOKIE GOT 6 PENS IN HIS FRONT SHIRT POCKET..

13 years ago  #747
Level 21
Status: offline
Gang: The Deplorables
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 7 months
Posts: 2,666

Originally posted by rjp123 HOKIE GOT 6 PENS IN HIS FRONT SHIRT POCKET..

great fucking post man, great post. i would expect no more out of you than this.

13 years ago  #748
Level 21
Status: offline
Gang: The Deplorables
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 7 months
Posts: 2,666

^^^^^^^ somebody is mad and throwing a hissy fit

03/17/2013 12:49pmKROWNVIC [DBB] attacked you! You lost and were knocked out for 22 minutes! Click here to see the whole battle.

13 years ago  #749
Banned
Status: offline
Prison: New Jersey
Incarcerated: 13 years, 2 months
Posts: 33

obama is a pussy

13 years ago  #750
Level 35
Status: offline
Gang: LIVE WIRE
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 9 months
Posts: 11,000

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/food-stamps-put-rhode-island-town-on-monthly-boom-and-bust-cycle/2013/03/16/08ace07c-8ce1-11e2-b63f-f53fb9f2fcb4_story.html

(As of the 2010 census Woonsocket had a population of 41,186. The population was 71.3% non-Hispanic white, 14.2% Hispanic or Latino, 6.4% African American, 5.4% Asian, 0.4% Native American and 4.3% reporting two or more races.)

http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-welfareblack.htm

Click me for music!

 

Quick Reply

You are unable to reply to this thread