Item Title

Item Description

OBAMA's 2nd TERM Discussion Thread

13 years ago  #751
Level 21
Status: offline
Gang: The Deplorables
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 7 months
Posts: 2,666

Originally posted by wormdogg10 http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/food-stamps-put-rhode-island-town-on-monthly-boom-and-bust-cycle/2013/03/16/08ace07c-8ce1-11e2-b63f-f53fb9f2fcb4_story.html

(As of the 2010 census Woonsocket had a population of 41,186. The population was 71.3% non-Hispanic white, 14.2% Hispanic or Latino, 6.4% African American, 5.4% Asian, 0.4% Native American and 4.3% reporting two or more races.)

http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-welfareblack.htm

so we celebrate the success of this president by the growing number of people on government support. shouldn't it be the other way around worm?

13 years ago  #752
Banned
Status: offline
Prison: New Jersey
Incarcerated: 13 years, 2 months
Posts: 33

obama said you people would donate 1 mil to me

13 years ago  #753
Level 35
Status: offline
Gang: LIVE WIRE
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 9 months
Posts: 11,000

Originally posted by hokiefan
Originally posted by wormdogg10 http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/food-stamps-put-rhode-island-town-on-monthly-boom-and-bust-cycle/2013/03/16/08ace07c-8ce1-11e2-b63f-f53fb9f2fcb4_story.html

(As of the 2010 census Woonsocket had a population of 41,186. The population was 71.3% non-Hispanic white, 14.2% Hispanic or Latino, 6.4% African American, 5.4% Asian, 0.4% Native American and 4.3% reporting two or more races.)

http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-welfareblack.htm

so we celebrate the success of this president by the growing number of people on government support. shouldn't it be the other way around worm?

This has nothing to due with Obama. This was posted to show your dumbass that all the people on welfare arent junkies and druggies with 15 kids and live in the inner city like you think they do. Dickhead

Last edited by wormdogg10 13 years ago

Click me for music!
13 years ago  #754
Level 21
Status: offline
Gang: The Deplorables
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 7 months
Posts: 2,666

Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by hokiefan
Originally posted by wormdogg10 http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/food-stamps-put-rhode-island-town-on-monthly-boom-and-bust-cycle/2013/03/16/08ace07c-8ce1-11e2-b63f-f53fb9f2fcb4_story.html

(As of the 2010 census Woonsocket had a population of 41,186. The population was 71.3% non-Hispanic white, 14.2% Hispanic or Latino, 6.4% African American, 5.4% Asian, 0.4% Native American and 4.3% reporting two or more races.)

http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-welfareblack.htm

so we celebrate the success of this president by the growing number of people on government support. shouldn't it be the other way around worm?

This has nothing to due with Obama. This was posted to show your dumbass that all the people on welfare arent junkies and druggies with 15 kids and live in the inner city like you think they do. Dickhead

what was your point? to say that more than poor black people take welfare? i know that dumbass, you're the one who came in here race baiting. YOU are the one who thinks everything I say is aimed at black people, that is your fault, you are the one who keeps flashing the race card. i can't say two words without being called a racist, it is a cheap, easy way for you to end the debate without having to make an argument.

13 years ago  #755
Level 35
Status: offline
Gang: LIVE WIRE
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 9 months
Posts: 11,000

Originally posted by hokiefan
Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by hokiefan
Originally posted by wormdogg10 http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/food-stamps-put-rhode-island-town-on-monthly-boom-and-bust-cycle/2013/03/16/08ace07c-8ce1-11e2-b63f-f53fb9f2fcb4_story.html

(As of the 2010 census Woonsocket had a population of 41,186. The population was 71.3% non-Hispanic white, 14.2% Hispanic or Latino, 6.4% African American, 5.4% Asian, 0.4% Native American and 4.3% reporting two or more races.)

http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-welfareblack.htm

so we celebrate the success of this president by the growing number of people on government support. shouldn't it be the other way around worm?

This has nothing to due with Obama. This was posted to show your dumbass that all the people on welfare arent junkies and druggies with 15 kids and live in the inner city like you think they do. Dickhead

what was your point? to say that more than poor black people take welfare? i know that dumbass, you're the one who came in here race baiting. YOU are the one who thinks everything I say is aimed at black people, that is your fault, you are the one who keeps flashing the race card. i can't say two words without being called a racist, it is a cheap, easy way for you to end the debate without having to make an argument.

No debates end when you no longer answer the questions which you've done on several occasions. Your the one who pre judges everyone when someone says the word poor. Your the one who claims everyone on the game who voted for Obama did so because hes black and for no other reason. Your the one who thinks you and shank are the only ones here with a job.So dont hit me with that race baiter bull shit. I call'em as I see'em. And you can keep trying to fool yourself if you want. But your sources and the comments on them show exactly who you are!

Click me for music!
13 years ago  #756
Level 34
Status: online
Gang: Disciples of Bino
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 10 months
Posts: 3,889

Not 100% accurate Worm....Hokie on many occasions has used multiple "sources" and made note of it,some of his sources may even be described as "liberal media".....and no where have I seen Hokie say everyone voted for Obama because he was black..shit,I'm sure a lot did,just as I'm sure a lot voted for Romney to NOT vote for the black guy..in both cases those voters were just ignorant...I'm sure a majority voted for him because he was a Democrat,whether it be teachers who felt he was more sympathetic to public education or women who bought into the "war on women" republican position....shit even posters here like rog or dick didn't vote for him because he was black but because of theiranti- republican bias (not a put down on their parts,and an assumption they voted)..but they didn't vote because of skin color......it's ez to pick on Hokie or myself because we are the most vocal,but thru-out this thread and the other,their have been many "shank/hokie" supporters and many "opposition" supporters.....but thru out I have never read Hokie slam 1 ethnicity like you claim.

13 years ago  #757
Level 35
Status: offline
Gang: LIVE WIRE
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 9 months
Posts: 11,000

Originally posted by shawshank Not 100% accurate Worm....Hokie on many occasions has used multiple "sources" and made note of it,some of his sources may even be described as "liberal media".....and no where have I seen Hokie say everyone voted for Obama because he was black..shit,I'm sure a lot did,just as I'm sure a lot voted for Romney to NOT vote for the black guy..in both cases those voters were just ignorant...I'm sure a majority voted for him because he was a Democrat,whether it be teachers who felt he was more sympathetic to public education or women who bought into the "war on women" republican position....shit even posters here like rog or dick didn't vote for him because he was black but because of theiranti- republican bias (not a put down on their parts,and an assumption they voted)..but they didn't vote because of skin color......it's ez to pick on Hokie or myself because we are the most vocal,but thru-out this thread and the other,their have been many "shank/hokie" supporters and many "opposition" supporters.....but thru out I have never read Hokie slam 1 ethnicity like you claim.

Just because you dont openly come out and say something doesnt mean it wasnt implied as hes done on several occasions. And as far as those 4 or 5 posts from the "liberal media" as you claim he obviously didnt read them nor you because when I called him out on them he changed the subject. Looking at an articles title and just posting with out reading isnt the same as being unbiased. Because Im sure he actually reads the Bullshit from "Thenewamerican" and other anti Obama internet rags he dredges up! Not anti democrat (which would also be straight biased which he usually posts from) but ANTI-OBAMA! This is what this second term is about people reading hate websites instead of looking at the dead weight in Congress who refuse to do anything for the people!

You for one scream about entitlements but I dont know if its just me but since the age of 13 I've been paying into SS and Unemployment the whole time. So if the time comes and I need these things they're there for me. And if you think Im wrong about the whole voting black thing if im not mistaken both you and Hokie said something to that affect in the other thread! But you would be correct that he was voted back in as Democrat because why would someone vote for Mittens and Flip flops in November? The fact that you guys blame Obama for the stalemate in congress perplexes me because he has no say in how they vote and how they shoot down what he offers. But when the sequester fails you'll still blame Obama because he went along with the good ole' boys!

Click me for music!
13 years ago  #758
Level 35
Status: offline
Gang: Anarchy
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 14 years, 6 months
Posts: 3,565

lol why's my name get brought into this? i been tryin to stay out of this debate for the most part.. i dont even remember saying who i voted for in here or the other thread

13 years ago  #759
Level 32
Status: offline
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 14 years, 2 months
Posts: 2,629

13 years ago  #760
Level 34
Status: online
Gang: Disciples of Bino
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 10 months
Posts: 3,889

Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by shawshank Not 100% accurate Worm....Hokie on many occasions has used multiple "sources" and made note of it,some of his sources may even be described as "liberal media".....and no where have I seen Hokie say everyone voted for Obama because he was black..shit,I'm sure a lot did,just as I'm sure a lot voted for Romney to NOT vote for the black guy..in both cases those voters were just ignorant...I'm sure a majority voted for him because he was a Democrat,whether it be teachers who felt he was more sympathetic to public education or women who bought into the "war on women" republican position....shit even posters here like rog or dick didn't vote for him because he was black but because of theiranti- republican bias (not a put down on their parts,and an assumption they voted)..but they didn't vote because of skin color......it's ez to pick on Hokie or myself because we are the most vocal,but thru-out this thread and the other,their have been many "shank/hokie" supporters and many "opposition" supporters.....but thru out I have never read Hokie slam 1 ethnicity like you claim.

Just because you dont openly come out and say something doesnt mean it wasnt implied as hes done on several occasions. And as far as those 4 or 5 posts from the "liberal media" as you claim he obviously didnt read them nor you because when I called him out on them he changed the subject. Looking at an articles title and just posting with out reading isnt the same as being unbiased. Because Im sure he actually reads the Bullshit from "Thenewamerican" and other anti Obama internet rags he dredges up! Not anti democrat (which would also be straight biased which he usually posts from) but ANTI-OBAMA! This is what this second term is about people reading hate websites instead of looking at the dead weight in Congress who refuse to do anything for the people!

You for one scream about entitlements but I dont know if its just me but since the age of 13 I've been paying into SS and Unemployment the whole time. So if the time comes and I need these things they're there for me. And if you think Im wrong about the whole voting black thing if im not mistaken both you and Hokie said something to that affect in the other thread! But you would be correct that he was voted back in as Democrat because why would someone vote for Mittens and Flip flops in November? The fact that you guys blame Obama for the stalemate in congress perplexes me because he has no say in how they vote and how they shoot down what he offers. But when the sequester fails you'll still blame Obama because he went along with the good ole' boys!

A lot of finger pointing,blaming Republicans for a do nothing administration...how have house republicans prevented Obama from submitting a budget in 4 years??...and how did Reagan get so much accomplished with a Democratic controlled congress??.......and I'm not sure why almost 1/2 the country voted for "mittens" or why a little more voted for "obama"..I guess to each their own......and I'm sure I've been paying ss a little longer then you,and the age needs to be raised,income levels for taxation raised for ss and a lot more revamped...maybe spend more on ss investigators so I don't see able bodied youths walking outta ss office w/ a check or the guy at the pub by noon at 37 years old on 100% social security disability.

 

Quick Reply

You are unable to reply to this thread