see...yur biased...i did not make complete nonsense...u only believe that because of these videos u watch...show both sides...then u got a thread...otherwise, yur just a conspiracy theorist

On the subject of 1+1 = 2 , of course im biased as all ive learned so far has convinced me that 1+1=2 , do u have any information for me to look at which suggests otherwise ? Ive never seen a documentary that is trying to prove that the mass media do not use indroctionation techniques, have you ? Ive seen many that do, and ive witnessed it myself in real life every day, once you understand the techniques they use its so easy to spot. Dont be afriad , dont let your pre-programmed defence systems prevent you from analising foreign information just as you analise what u see on tv everyday. I challange you to tell me, if they are not using the indroctionation techniques he describes, then explanin what they ARE doing to me .

Last edited by eazyas 15 years ago

Here is the conclusion of the video series, were u meet the "creepy voice" eh nick :

My friend Raul had said before that he wanted a doc made by a neutral on this subject and this is how i answered him :

Originally posted by Raul_DukeI would like to see someone look at things from both sides and compare/debate these issues and conclude on them. The people that make all these videos about the so called ''truth'', obviously believe 1 thing and the government/general media paint their own picture of ''lies''.

Now personally I dont have much faith in any of them, is there any documentaries or text made by someone looking at both sides and disecting all of that information to give an un-biased opinion? That I would watch/read.

Or else I am just hella confused and to be honest.... Ignorance is bliss.

In alot of the documentrys ive posted , most recent being "the secrets of oz" which looks mainly at the history of money and todays economies The main guy does basiclly what you are saying, which shows me that you havn't watched any of the documentrys ive passed to you which you said "ill give it a watch " to.

Now you may say that he is not a neutral , however, I would say that after anyone looks into these things in depth they will no longer be a "neutral" on the area they have studied, what your asking for isn't possible simply beacuse after you have studied something you will have an opinion one way or the other, and in my experience after studing these things no-one concludes in the media/governments favor.

Last edited by eazyas 15 years ago

nice pics wooley

Originally posted by eazyas

nice pics wooley

Thanks where my kinetic ?