I did find a few threads from searching, but I honestly can't fix it on the timeline if it was before or after we could sell items/amens for favors.

Would it be possible to send favors straight to someone like we have always been able to buy favors for someone?  (say for the same 10 favor fee as listing something now for favors)?

For example, i'm trading my 8k eds for someone's 100 favors.... i send them 8k eds and they send me 100 favors (+10 favor transfer fee).  It works the same way as if i listed an item for 100 favors, they buy it, then i send them the eds.  just simplifies the trade a little bit. 

I think it changes who pays that 10 favor listing fee (in the current setup, i would, with the change, they would), but i'm pretty sure we can work out new prices amongst ourselves.

thanks

Its smart but has been suggested a couple of times so i dont think its gonna happen

and mugging for favors they go around jus like money now

Does it really change the way it is now? Like you said, the only thing that would happen is the 10 favor listing fee would be deducted from the other person. Not exactly necessary.

And mugging favors is a stupid idea. The warden isn't going to say "Oh, this guy I owed favors to got mugged. Guess I owe his mugger a favor or 2 now"

yeah, i do know it was suggested before, but like i said, trying to search on the shitty titles people use is an exercise in madness. to me it makes sense, since there's no gaming the system, just simplifying something we can already do. and there actually are people out there that need favors quick, have the items to trade, but don't have the 10 favors to list something for sale.

no, it doesn't change the way things are, just makes it a little easier, and it helps the people that for whatever reason don't have 10 favors to list something.

Then keep 10 favors on hand. Or wait for the voting links or do offers in the Warden's office. If someone's in a hurry to sell and finds that they are unable to, whose fault but their own is it that they're unprepared?

If it's implemented, great, but it doesn't seem like it's something that really needs to be added.

Last edited by Kron 14 years ago

Not sure I can say "no" any more creatively than I have numerous times in the past on this very topic.