Should Assault Weapons be Banned in The USA
they were made available..so ya too me in this case thats given
hokiefanare you really making this fucking argument? really? really? really? so if you are the dealer at the gun show and you sell a fast and furious gun to a criminal, as INSTRUCTED TO by ATF AGENTS, and that gun is used in a crime and you are indicted as an accessory to the crime because you sold the gun to someone you shouldn't have, then who are you going to blame? uhhh.. well they told me to sell it so i sold it to them.
wormdogg10Where they given those guns? Theres no argument what the intent was the question is were they given the guns?
are you really making this fucking argument? really? really? really? so if you are the dealer at the gun show and you sell a fast and furious gun to a criminal, as INSTRUCTED TO by ATF AGENTS, and that gun is used in a crime and you are indicted as an accessory to the crime because you sold the gun to someone you shouldn't have, then who are you going to blame? uhhh.. well they told me to sell it so i sold it to them.
The gun was sold legally its the reselling that was a crime. The reseller is the accessory because HE sold them to someone knowing the intent.
hokiefanWhere they given those guns? Theres no argument what the intent was the question is were they given the guns?
are you really making this fucking argument? really? really? really? so if you are the dealer at the gun show and you sell a fast and furious gun to a criminal, as INSTRUCTED TO by ATF AGENTS, and that gun is used in a crime and you are indicted as an accessory to the crime because you sold the gun to someone you shouldn't have, then who are you going to blame? uhhh.. well they told me to sell it so i sold it to them.
The gun was sold legally its the reselling that was a crime. The reseller is the accessory because HE sold them to someone knowing the intent.
so you are saying it's all good what the government did down there.
wormdogg10Where they given those guns? Theres no argument what the intent was the question is were they given the guns?
are you really making this fucking argument? really? really? really? so if you are the dealer at the gun show and you sell a fast and furious gun to a criminal, as INSTRUCTED TO by ATF AGENTS, and that gun is used in a crime and you are indicted as an accessory to the crime because you sold the gun to someone you shouldn't have, then who are you going to blame? uhhh.. well they told me to sell it so i sold it to them.
The gun was sold legally its the reselling that was a crime. The reseller is the accessory because HE sold them to someone knowing the intent.
so you are saying it's all good what the government did down there.
Never said that.
hokiefangun control:
edit: this is the kind of stuff that the media won't touch...
Last edited by hokiefan 13 years ago
wormdogg10edit: this is the kind of stuff that the media won't touch...
Maybe the media wont touch it ( even though they just did
) is because there you have an armed former security guard who did nothing. Was he actually there? Any witnesses saying they saw him there gun out ready to strike but hesitated?
journalism is dead in this country.
No maybe other media outlets are waiting to see how his story adds up! And since it doesnt make much since they're doing do diligence and gathering facts?
wormdogg10what she said *points to rita*
Rooster...

First
