Item Title

Item Description

Should battles be public?

16 years ago  #1
Level 29
Status: offline
Gang: Evil Empire
Prison: Louisiana
Incarcerated: 17 years, 2 months
Posts: 6,855

Hey guys,

This is something I've been going back and forth on for a while. Should battles be public? For example, if I fight Lady and link alina, should she be able to see it? I suppose some people may not want that shown, but I guess that's part of the fun no?

I'm leaning towards making it public and having a  "Last 5 Battles" section of the user profile.

So what do we think?

16 years ago  #2
Level 10
Status: offline
Prison: Putnam
Incarcerated: 17 years, 2 months
Posts: 9

from doing that you will learn the stats of another player but you can just as easily find that out by attacking them yourself

so for me it doesnt matter either way i am good with it

 
16 years ago  #3
Level 29
Status: offline
Gang: Evil Empire
Prison: Louisiana
Incarcerated: 17 years, 2 months
Posts: 6,855

True, but if someone links it to show someone else, then they could've easily told that other person...

As for it being linked from the profile though, I think a good thing to do would be to have it where stats are hidden if you aren't the attacker or opponent

16 years ago  #4
Level 10
Status: offline
Prison: Putnam
Incarcerated: 17 years, 2 months
Posts: 9

i do know in other games if your in a legion, clan etc it has an attack log so you can see who has been attacking or attacked

the only difference is this would be open for others to see but if its only the last 5 attacks that wont show to much of what they do

 
16 years ago  #5
Level 10
Status: offline
Prison: Putnam
Incarcerated: 17 years, 6 days
Posts: 418

Maybe not the details of the match. Just Craddock vs. CrapHead Winner Craddock Maybe some type of thing by there name stating what kind of streak, our how many times they have been beaten down.

Example!

Craddock vs. CrapHead I Craddock I 4 Battle Winning Streak

The attacker should get listed first (me), then the Defender.... yea, then the winners current streak. I think that would be an interesting addition.

Also in my personal option. Users should not be able to attack people that are 5 Levels (atleast) under them. I think that level 1 users cannot be attacked by anyone other another level 1 user, and they can attack up to w/e level is allowed in there city. This way poor little level ones wont get frustrated with the game.

 
16 years ago  #6
Level 29
Status: offline
Gang: Evil Empire
Prison: Louisiana
Incarcerated: 17 years, 2 months
Posts: 6,855

I'm actually going to ditch battles for profiles for now, but I did implement the whole you can't attack a level 1 if you're above level 1 thing.

16 years ago  #7
Level 10
Status: offline
Prison: Putnam
Incarcerated: 17 years, 6 days
Posts: 418

Awesomeness. Those poor level ones will be so happy not to get there asses kicked. Consider it Wardens Immunity, lol!

Originally posted by Mufasa I'm actually going to ditch battles for profiles for now, but I did implement the whole you can't attack a level 1 if you're above level 1 thing.

 
16 years ago  #8
Level 29
Status: offline
Gang: Evil Empire
Prison: Louisiana
Incarcerated: 17 years, 2 months
Posts: 6,855

haha, catchy name

16 years ago  #9
Level 10
Status: offline
Prison: Putnam
Incarcerated: 17 years, 6 days
Posts: 418

Yea, it is, isnt it The warden grants all immates Wardens Immuninity until they reach Level 2. Yea. Catchy.

 
16 years ago  #10
Level 15
Status: offline
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 17 years, 6 days
Posts: 52

Ok instead of just making it availible for anyone to see. How about you charge a small fee to see the battle details. Yes it would be like spying on them but it would also be a two for one. You get to see two inmates info.

 

 

Quick Reply

You are unable to reply to this thread