Originally posted by MONTEZUMA

Originally posted by jshank718

Originally posted by Slickster

Since we're going by one on one, scoring is the most important, right? Jordan 14years 32,292pts Kobe 14years 27,868. No need for everything else, cause we know what it is. There's no comparison.

i thought you was brighter den dat

men lie women lie numbers dont...and i think jordans d was better than kobe too

True, he even has a defensive player of the year award to prove it. There is no comparison. Better in every stat category, more awards,and titles all in the same time, or less.

Last edited by Slickster 15 years ago

im going to explain why kobe is da greates lasker of all time & sum of my points wil also lead/support dat U jus kant go on points skored in 14 yrs. kobe has more scoring ablitity. kobe makes the tuffer shots & and is a betters shot maker. (percentage isnt the key here even tho i didnt look it up).

but B4 i explain kobe beein da best laker giv me sum names of wich laker(s) he isnt betta den.

true

yo yall killin da thread ! goni off topic !

da question is who will win 1 on 1 NOT who's betta !!

All you're saying is Kobe can probably beat Jordan in horse.Every Laker named in above posts. Why is Kobe better than them?

Last edited by Slickster 15 years ago

True or False are you a scammer?

you gotta also think when kobe came in the nba, strait out of highschool no college experience. so the numbers really arnt that big of a deal im talkin in their prime, still good opinions here though.

Jordan played less than 20 games his second season and first comeback season and retired 3 times. At NO point in his career could he fuck with Jordan.

Last edited by Slickster 15 years ago

so magic & kareem ? yall sayin dem 2 are betta den kobe? any1 else B4 i explain?