lol you even don't know who were Talibans… & who made up this "Wahabi" Terminology…

Osama was never been a significant figure between muslims, not even a figure for Taliban, who themself tried to remove him (the guy who finance them) from Aghanistan, when US Started to shout about attacking Aghanistan…

people don't like US only because of their policies…

people don't like US only because of their policies…u know what i say,who gives a fuck what other countries think of us?..they need us,we don't need them:)

u keep saying we, as if your whole countery is united , working together as part of 1 system. You really need to start digging deeper.

Do u think the recent wars benifit the average american or european ?

Do u think the recent wars benifit , for just 1 example, people with shares, or a financial intrest in the military industrial complex?

question #1..yes,i think the us and especially europe(given closer proximity) r better off w/out sadam and bin laden and w/ the us push of trying to start democracys in the middle east and terrorist on the run....question #2 if the average american was astute enuff to invest in defense stocks,then yes they r better off..but anyone can invest in stocks ez,i made a killing on elan,an irish bio-tech:)

I dissagree, the american and european people are not better off after the recent wars, because they are now even more hated globaly, fucking around were ur not welcome generally pisses people off ( a good example is the hanging of sadam, live on the internet, on a muslim holiday, imagine the flipside of that, muslim army invades america hangs obama live on the intenet on christmas, yeah the locals are gonna be real happy), and actually raises the chances of something like another 911 happening on american or european soil. Also the average citizin sholders the financial burden of these wars, despite both nations being in more debt than ever.

We can aggree, however, that certian people (for example shareholders in BAE systems, oil companies, denfece contractors/mercanaries) will benifit from these wars, financially.

Last edited by eazyas 15 years ago

well hopefully some of my retirement plans r invested in them:)..as far as safety ez,it ez to sit back and say we r not safer now..but i know the u.s. Has NOT been attacked since 9/11..thats a fact,now if sadam or bin-laden were left free to their own devices..thats up for speculation.sometimes u gotta go on the aggresive and not sit back..thank god GW was in the white house when 9/11.

How many times were u attacked by terrorists before 911? Were there no muslim terrorists before then ?

What about the shoe bomber ( that CIA escorted onto a plan FACT) and underwear bomber, 2 big recent mass media stage shows.

Leaving saddam and bin laden to their own devices would have been a good idea, but the elites running your country thought it would be a great idea to supply them with all sorts of weapons and financial and trade aid to try and get them to "work for them" , check it out, its true

it is true...during the soviet invasion of afghanistan bin-laden was an ally..but to say we would of been better off is pure speculation..we can hyperbole what coulda happened(i.e. Sadam gets nuclear weapon and kills millions in london or new york or bin-laden sets off dirty bomb during world cup or super bowl)...i deal in what has happened..not what woulda happened.

i deal in what has happened

this happened

the elites running your country thought it would be a great idea to supply them with all sorts of weapons and financial and trade aid to try and get them to "work for them" ,