Item Title

Item Description

Should Assault Weapons be Banned in The USA

13 years ago  #371
Level 21
Status: offline
Gang: The Deplorables
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 7 months
Posts: 2,666

Originally posted by wormdogg10

yeah try telling that to someone breaking into your home with a gun who is ready to shoot you. he'll just laugh his ass off at you.

13 years ago  #372
Banned
Status: offline
Gang: The Muffin Busters
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 14 years, 11 days
Posts: 4,062

Who da man? took me 20 mins

13 years ago  #373
Level 26
Status: offline
Gang: Victory
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 11 months
Posts: 6,769

Originally posted by ProdigyX

Who da man? took me 20 mins

what dafuq does it say..its moving to fast

] You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those that can do nothing for him!
13 years ago  #374
Level 35
Status: offline
Gang: LIVE WIRE
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 9 months
Posts: 11,000

Break in my house and think I dont have a gun if you want to You dumb fuck. Matter of fact stand next to me on the street and think im not packing! This is about Assault weapons. As a "Hokiefan" I suppose you think the VA Tech shooter was right huh?

Click me for music!
13 years ago  #375
Level 21
Status: offline
Gang: The Deplorables
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 7 months
Posts: 2,666

Originally posted by wormdogg10 Break in my house and think I dont have a gun if you want to You dumb fuck. Matter of fact stand next to me on the street and think im not packing! This is about Assault weapons. As a "Hokiefan" I suppose you think the VA Tech shooter was right huh?

nah man not even cool, he was sick and background check should have caught that given he already had been through court system for his problems. and the walther p22 is a semi-automatic handgun, not an assault rifle. i think we need to upgrade what we do for background checks, but i don't think it should put the weight on the shoulders of doctors to decide who is capable of owning a gun and who is not.

13 years ago  #376
Level 31
Status: offline
Gang: MeMyselfnI
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 16 years, 9 days
Posts: 7,235

no shooter has used a REAL assault weapon in ANY of these shootings...just saying

13 years ago  #377
Level 35
Status: offline
Gang: LIVE WIRE
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 9 months
Posts: 11,000

Originally posted by hokiefan
Originally posted by wormdogg10 Break in my house and think I dont have a gun if you want to You dumb fuck. Matter of fact stand next to me on the street and think im not packing! This is about Assault weapons. As a "Hokiefan" I suppose you think the VA Tech shooter was right huh?

nah man not even cool, he was sick and background check should have caught that given he already had been through court system for his problems. and the walther p22 is a semi-automatic handgun, not an assault rifle. i think we need to upgrade what we do for background checks, but i don't think it should put the weight on the shoulders of doctors to decide who is capable of owning a gun and who is not.

So what would a background check do if you cant include a doctors findings? Nothing absolutely nothing!!!! These are the things you should think about!!!!

Click me for music!
13 years ago  #378
Level 21
Status: offline
Gang: The Deplorables
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 7 months
Posts: 2,666

Originally posted by nickrox no shooter has used a REAL assault weapon in ANY of these shootings...just saying

no Nick they want you to believe that assault rifles are at the root of all shootings. so we ban assault rifles and when the shootings continue, the next logical step is to start confiscating smaller weapons since those still get used. all the good citizens give up their guns and the shootings still occur. then what? liberalism is a mental disorder.

13 years ago  #379
Level 21
Status: offline
Gang: The Deplorables
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 7 months
Posts: 2,666

Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by hokiefan
Originally posted by wormdogg10 Break in my house and think I dont have a gun if you want to You dumb fuck. Matter of fact stand next to me on the street and think im not packing! This is about Assault weapons. As a "Hokiefan" I suppose you think the VA Tech shooter was right huh?

nah man not even cool, he was sick and background check should have caught that given he already had been through court system for his problems. and the walther p22 is a semi-automatic handgun, not an assault rifle. i think we need to upgrade what we do for background checks, but i don't think it should put the weight on the shoulders of doctors to decide who is capable of owning a gun and who is not.

So what would a background check do if you cant include a doctors findings? Nothing absolutely nothing!!!! These are the things you should think about!!!!

difference between including a doctors findings and instructing doctors to pick and choose who can and cant own a gun. since they would be apt to get sued if they don't report someone who committed a crime, they are going to err on the side of caution and report folks who are borderline or close to the line and not allow them to have guns. hurts the good citizens.

13 years ago  #380
Level 31
Status: offline
Gang: MeMyselfnI
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 16 years, 9 days
Posts: 7,235

i dont mind better background checks..hell even a month waiting period..track bullets..i dont care..but the otherside has got to realize that banning assault weapons isnt going to do jack shit

 

Quick Reply

You are unable to reply to this thread