Item Title

Item Description
This game is no longer supported. All play is at your own risk. X
8 Inmates Online Home Wiki Forums Shoutbox Contact
Forums Home // The Prison Yard // Thread for people interested in Global Issues

Thread for people interested in Global Issues

Post Reply
Thread Tools
Subscribe to Thread Mark Thread Read
15 years ago  #21
eazyas
View Profile Send Message Attack eazyas View Posts
Level 23
Status: offline
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 16 years, 4 months
Posts: 5,667

Originally posted by woolley
Originally posted by eazyas If certain people or organisations were profiting from the war and wanted it to continue then polices like this would surly be in their favor

but the only reason for the war was "nuclear weapons" but their was none so i guess the only thing that they went to war for was oil then

In my opinion Iraq wasn't "part of the gang" ie America, Europe ect, and like Iran showed no itentions of wanting to become part of that group , Old Saddam Towed the line for a while and he was rewarded for doing so with weapons and funds by America/Europe, but he started to think that he didnt need that support and he could run his country his own way so the leadership and support was be removed and replaced with people sympathetic to the cause, conform or die. The oil is just a bonus.

Last edited by eazyas 15 years ago

DONATE BTC - 134YMw8h2p6FuTAjpjcv2DhrMD3C6hgpPJ
15 years ago  #22
BubbaKush
View Profile Send Message Attack BubbaKush View Posts
Level 27
Status: offline
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 11 months
Posts: 10,409

Originally posted by eazyas
Originally posted by woolley
Originally posted by eazyas If certain people or organisations were profiting from the war and wanted it to continue then polices like this would surly be in their favor

but the only reason for the war was "nuclear weapons" but their was none so i guess the only thing that they went to war for was oil then

In my opinion Iraq wasn't "part of the gang" ie America, Europe ect, and like Iran showed no itentions of wanting to become part of that group , Old Saddam Towed the line for a while and he was rewarded for doing so with weapons and funds by America/Europe, but he started to think that he didnt need that support and he could run his country his own way so the leadership and support was be removed and replaced with people sympathetic to the cause, conform or die. The oil is just a bonus.

NWO

15 years ago  #23
woolley
View Profile Send Message Attack woolley View Posts
Banned
Status: offline
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 16 years, 3 months
Posts: 3,762

Originally posted by eazyas
Originally posted by woolley
Originally posted by eazyas If certain people or organisations were profiting from the war and wanted it to continue then polices like this would surly be in their favor

but the only reason for the war was "nuclear weapons" but their was none so i guess the only thing that they went to war for was oil then

In my opinion Iraq wasn't "part of the gang" ie America, Europe ect, and like Iran showed no itentions of wanting to become part of that group , Old Saddam Towed the line for a while and he was rewarded for doing so with weapons and funds by America/Europe, but he started to think that he didnt need that support and he could run his country his own way so the leadership and support was be removed and replaced with people sympathetic to the cause, conform or die. The oil is just a bonus.

very good point if you look at the bigger picture then your right

15 years ago  #24
eazyas
View Profile Send Message Attack eazyas View Posts
Level 23
Status: offline
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 16 years, 4 months
Posts: 5,667

In this episode of the Keiser Report, broadcast on Russia Today TV channel about 1 week ago Max looks at the economics of warfare in his unique style, and, he tells Iran how to aviod war .

Last edited by eazyas 15 years ago

DONATE BTC - 134YMw8h2p6FuTAjpjcv2DhrMD3C6hgpPJ
15 years ago  #25
Riotgoo...
View Profile Send Message Attack Riotgoo... View Posts
Level 13
Status: offline
Prison: Arizona
Incarcerated: 16 years, 1 month
Posts: 366

Originally posted by woolley
Originally posted by eazyas
Originally posted by woolley What they didnt mention is that if a taliban troop is captured after giving him self up they have to release him after 10 days and cannot harm him or arrest him its all screwed up

I didnt know about that, So u mean they can hold him without any evidence agenst him for 10 days? I would immagine that if he was guilty of murder or something like that he would face a trail of some sort, no ?

guilty or not they have to release him they cannot arrest or jail somone or kill them once they have been captured

watch from 3 minutes onwards

15 years ago  #26
NasIsLike
View Profile Send Message Attack NasIsLike View Posts
Level 13
Status: offline
Prison: Arizona
Incarcerated: 16 years, 3 months
Posts: 198

Originally posted by eazyas
Originally posted by woolley
Originally posted by eazyas If certain people or organisations were profiting from the war and wanted it to continue then polices like this would surly be in their favor

but the only reason for the war was "nuclear weapons" but their was none so i guess the only thing that they went to war for was oil then

In my opinion Iraq wasn't "part of the gang" ie America, Europe ect, and like Iran showed no itentions of wanting to become part of that group , Old Saddam Towed the line for a while and he was rewarded for doing so with weapons and funds by America/Europe, but he started to think that he didnt need that support and he could run his country his own way so the leadership and support was be removed and replaced with people sympathetic to the cause, conform or die. The oil is just a bonus.

Im sure it had nothing to do with the genocide or the overall opression of women or the opression of non suni citizens or the invasions he led in the 80s and early 90s or his willingness to use mustard gas and other banned chemical agents... its all because he wouldnt conform... riiiiiight.. i never supported the invasion of iraq... but come on....

15 years ago  #27
eazyas
View Profile Send Message Attack eazyas View Posts
Level 23
Status: offline
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 16 years, 4 months
Posts: 5,667

When he was doing the genocide in the 80's and 90's he was armed and supplied by the usa and europe, he was working for the gang back then .

DONATE BTC - 134YMw8h2p6FuTAjpjcv2DhrMD3C6hgpPJ
15 years ago  #28
eazyas
View Profile Send Message Attack eazyas View Posts
Level 23
Status: offline
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 16 years, 4 months
Posts: 5,667

Originally posted by Riotgoon187
Originally posted by woolley
Originally posted by eazyas
Originally posted by woolley What they didnt mention is that if a taliban troop is captured after giving him self up they have to release him after 10 days and cannot harm him or arrest him its all screwed up

I didnt know about that, So u mean they can hold him without any evidence agenst him for 10 days? I would immagine that if he was guilty of murder or something like that he would face a trail of some sort, no ?

guilty or not they have to release him they cannot arrest or jail somone or kill them once they have been captured

watch from 3 minutes onwards

It sayed "not enough evidence to convict him so he was released" does that mean if he was caught red handed he would be trialed and convicted ?

DONATE BTC - 134YMw8h2p6FuTAjpjcv2DhrMD3C6hgpPJ
15 years ago  #29
NasIsLike
View Profile Send Message Attack NasIsLike View Posts
Level 13
Status: offline
Prison: Arizona
Incarcerated: 16 years, 3 months
Posts: 198

Originally posted by eazyas When he was doing the genocide in the 80's and 90's he was armed and supplied by the usa and europe, he was working for the gang back then .

lol no we were at war with iraq in 90-91 and besides that it was actually the russians arming them.. they used AKs and T90 tanks not m16s and abrhams

15 years ago  #30
eazyas
View Profile Send Message Attack eazyas View Posts
Level 23
Status: offline
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 16 years, 4 months
Posts: 5,667

Originally posted by NasIsLike
Originally posted by eazyas When he was doing the genocide in the 80's and 90's he was armed and supplied by the usa and europe, he was working for the gang back then .

lol no we were at war with iraq in 90-91 and besides that it was actually the russians arming them.. they used AKs and T90 tanks not m16s and abrhams

have a look at this

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_support_for_Iraq_during_the_Iran%E2%80%93Iraq_war

DONATE BTC - 134YMw8h2p6FuTAjpjcv2DhrMD3C6hgpPJ

 

Quick Reply

You are unable to reply to this thread