Eazy - Archaeopteryx ... nuff said

Archaeopteryx:

- is the earliest and most primitive bird known

- Archaeopteryx lived in the Late Jurassic Period around 150 million years ago, in what is now southern Germany during a time when Europe was an archipelago of islands in a shallow warm tropical sea, much closer to the equator than it is now.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaeopteryx

The first remains of Archaeopteryx were discovered in 1861; just two years after Charles Darwin published On the Origin of Species. Archaeopteryx seemed to confirm Darwin's theories and has since become a key piece of evidence for the origin of birds, the transitional fossils debate, and confirmation of evolution. Indeed, further research on dinosaurs from the Gobi Desert and China has since provided more evidence of a link between Archaeopteryx and the dinosaurs, such as the Chinese feathered dinosaurs. Archaeopteryx is close to the ancestry of modern birds, and it shows most of the features one would expect in an ancestral bird. However, it may not be the direct ancestor of living birds, and it is uncertain how much evolutionary divergence was already present among other birds at the time.

Last edited by Slumdog 15 years ago

Originally posted by Slumdog

Originally posted by woolley

Originally posted by Pegg

Originally posted by Slumdog

I love how this tread covers 3 different discussions at the same time

Yeah the Queen,the war on terrorists and where people came from lmao

and would you fuck kate

I would love to be her personal trainer for the weekend...

yeah id give it a stab

clearly your not but anyway, since you dug your grave deeper in support of what im saying,

i've explained how we got here as humans. look a few pages back. mayB you hav too many conversations going on at da same time to keep up, is dat it ? snakeman also said "That really isn't that far fetched,and made sense" (comment # 41). so i did explain.

now you said "Butterflys and frogs are not examples of one species changing to another becuase when they lay eggs, guess what those eggs are? this is not an example of macro evoloution but of a life cycle"

speak to me when you understand the meanin between micro & macro.

guess what, all those life forms start off as eggs as you stated. any type of female has eggs dat need developing. thus proving my point like i said B4, all in all we (humans, trees, aquatic creatures, reptiles, suns, planets, anything living or consist of energy) are all one in the same (reply # 40). we all have similarities, we are all different forms of energy.

how each life form developed into how/what they are now? thats a different discussion.

how bout we talk more when you dont have so many conversations going simultaneously.

in theroy if a creatue has evolved, when it reproduces, should the new life not be the same as the evolved creature, and not backtrack and evolve again in a cycle like butterflys and frogs?

macro is the overall plan or picture, while micro is a very specific action or detail, in my owns words without getting out the google,

but yeah, ive been hounding u trying to get an aswer out of u for a few days now, and mabye this thread wasnt the right place to pull u up on it, so if u wanna make a fresh thread to discuss the origon of life and humans ill b there.

we'll talk more on it anotha time. we kud do PM's, dont matta to me.

imma B gone a few days so i'll hardly B online, mayB log on here & there to vote.

if anything hit my inbox, i believe yur in on my friend's list.