Item Title

Item Description

Should Assault Weapons be Banned in The USA

13 years ago  #41
Level 21
Status: offline
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 14 years, 10 months
Posts: 2,989

To everyone saying 'if one of them people in the Batman shootings had an assault rifle they could have stopped it' surely the gunmen would have just shot him first? and if everyones walking around with AK47's to go to the local shop and back isnt that making everyone feel LESS safe? If I was walking around in america and everyone and his dog had m16's incase one mentally 'unstable'kid thought a bunny would look better red then I wouldnt feel safe at all :L

To everyone saying it makes the innocent more vunerable... In the US I read somewhere there is about 11000 shootings a year, in the UK with no guns legally (we still have people importing them, getting them illegally) there are about 60 shootings a year

13 years ago  #42
Level 20
Status: offline
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 7 months
Posts: 3,554

plain and simple people kill people not guns

13 years ago  #43
Level 35
Status: offline
Gang: Anarchy
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 14 years, 6 months
Posts: 3,565

u guys cant have guns across the pond?

13 years ago  #44
Level 21
Status: offline
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 14 years, 10 months
Posts: 2,989

Originally posted by rog_ u guys cant have guns across the pond?

Only with a certain license and they need to be securely locked up and away from the house incase of a burglary, and the po po get them, other than that.. not legally

13 years ago  #45
Level 21
Status: offline
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 14 years, 10 months
Posts: 2,989

Oh nd before we get to quoting the constitution, " A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." What would you describe as 'arms'? Armaments? A nuclear bomb is an armament, should everyone have them incase someone shoots another in a cinema?

13 years ago  #46
Level 37
Status: offline
Gang: Evil Empire
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 16 years, 1 month
Posts: 7,328

comparing guns to nuclear bomb is silly

13 years ago  #47
Level 21
Status: offline
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 14 years, 10 months
Posts: 2,989

Originally posted by neo88 comparing guns to nuclear bomb is silly

They're both made for the sole purpose to kill and classed as an armament

13 years ago  #48
Level 37
Status: offline
Gang: Evil Empire
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 16 years, 1 month
Posts: 7,328

Originally posted by RR123
Originally posted by neo88 comparing guns to nuclear bomb is silly

They're both made for the sole purpose to kill and classed as an armament

nobody here is trying to argue all citizens should have nuclear bombs. they can take out whole cities.

personally I dont see what banning assault weapons will do.

what if the batman and newtown shooters only had shotguns and handguns.

they would have killed 3 or 4 less people?

bigger problem here then assault weapons.

13 years ago  #49
Banned
Status: offline
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 13 years, 9 months
Posts: 2,770

Originally posted by RR123
Originally posted by neo88 comparing guns to nuclear bomb is silly

They're both made for the sole purpose to kill and classed as an armament

Lets just leave the bombs outa this

13 years ago  #50
Level 21
Status: offline
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 14 years, 10 months
Posts: 2,989

Originally posted by neo88
Originally posted by RR123
Originally posted by neo88 comparing guns to nuclear bomb is silly

They're both made for the sole purpose to kill and classed as an armament

nobody here is trying to argue all citizens should have nuclear bombs. they can take out whole cities

Just like enough nutters with a sturmgewher44 (nazis)

 

Quick Reply

You are unable to reply to this thread