Im all for people spreading good info and earning a wage at it, if your interested ALL of infowars accounts are published online..

You think that rich people planning world govenment is only a theroy? please then tell me the purpose of organisations such as G20 , UN ect ect

And bilderberg group

Im a beliver in inteligent design, when i look at this stuff deeply its the only thing that makes sence to me, i cant explain everything and dont try to, and i dont as shank says, believe evey word in the bible .

But when people try to push theroys as fact, its my duty to be inquisitive ....

i gotta go to work now but ill b back soon to continue this interesting thread.

yours is a modern religious belief without a shred of evidence other than arguments against evolution. you cant prove one thing by arguing against another.

Last edited by Rudigger 15 years ago

what you should B asking is whats the definition of micro & macro.

gorillas dont possess the advance brain as us humans do (no livin creature does) so they pretty much are where they at as far as adapting to their enviroment. only changes you'll see is if thers changes in the enviroment.

now what im guessing is you want to know how the gap between the 2 came about.

with out the need to over come something then thers no need to "think" of a solution. no thinkin is no excercise in the brain, no excercise in the brain leads to no growth/advancements in the brain.

heres my guess(im stil researchin,not jus takin othas answers/opinions) is that the gap between us (and all other livin creatures) in our brains, intelligence came from the need to solve thing in order to survive. different enviroments calls for more thinkin in order to survive. so im "assuming" (im stil researchin) that humans in earlier times were in a moredifficult to survive then gorillas.

BUT

i also agreed with snakeman & said many believe our species were kicked off or started by extra terrestrials.

its not far fetched to me because there was a big gap in human growth, mentally & physically that we kant explain

so where im at with my research & the lates trend in "evoltionary" science is explaining this gap. but as you kan see i also hav my own opinions & questions.

Faith : firm belief in something for which there is no proof.

+ 1

exactly my point. why argue against something when your counter-argument is merely a belief without a shred of evidence. its like pissing into the wind in my opinion.

until there is ANY sort of evidence for anything BUT evolution. its the only theory with any weight behind it..

Last edited by Rudigger 15 years ago

i dont think believers that god created us are foolish at all until they argue against evolution when they only have said beliefs, not hard evidence.

you see rudy, reason why people believe in things like, religion & shit is because they get to a stand still witrh their questions so they stop there & jus pin it on sumtin else to explain it instead of tryin to figure out the answer.

its basically giivng up (limiting yourself).

its minds like mine, that seek the answers to the "impossible" that make the break throughs & improvements for society. through out history how many times have things seemed impossible but are now standard & basic today?